A tailored toolkit drawn from ECCO's full Library — your industry, your stack, your gaps, packaged as a single working document. You buy it once, you get it, you walk away complete.
The AI Library indexes 152+ tools across twelve verticals. The Patron Toolkit is the curated subset — hand-picked against your specific business context, sequenced for deployment, and shipped as one document you can act on without further ECCO involvement.
The toolkit opens with a single-page synthesis: here is what you told us, here is what we are recommending, here is why. Designed to be load-bearing on its own — if you only ever read this page, you still walk away with the core recommendation.
Half a page per tool. What it does in the context of your specific workflow. Why it is right for you and not someone else. What it costs at your scale. What to watch for. Where it slots into the order of operations.
Adapted from the Integrity Blueprint's five-layer framework, tailored to your regulatory environment. State-specific where relevant. NAIC-aware for insurance carriers. Names the gaps the recommended stack closes — and the gaps it does not.
Which tools to deploy first. Which to wait on. Which depend on which. What success looks like at each step. The sequence is the difference between a stack that compounds and a stack that tangles.
The integrity layer. Acknowledges where the toolkit will not solve your problem and what would. If your real bottleneck is upstream of any AI tool, the document says so directly. No tool is recommended to fill space.
The closing section names three paths forward, with no pressure on any of them. Self-deploy from the document. Schedule the optional 30-minute walkthrough call within 30 days. Or upgrade to a hands-on Operator Residency. Each is complete on its own.
Composite scenarios drawn from ECCO's pipeline conversations and the verticals the Library covers most deeply. Names and details are illustrative; the structure is real.
12-person agency, P&C and life, three AI tools already in production, no provenance trail.
"We're using a quote-bot, a document summarizer, and a voice transcription tool. Carriers are starting to ask about AI governance. We don't have answers. The NAIC pilot starts in our state and we don't know what's compliant and what isn't."
Eleven tools curated against Colorado SB24-205 and the NAIC AI Systems Evaluation Tool. Two existing tools flagged for replacement, one kept with a logging wrapper. A four-step deployment sequence to be carrier-ready before the November rollout. A one-page exec summary the agency owner can hand to underwriting partners.
$80M annual revenue, four estimators, contract review backlog, no clear AI strategy.
"We tried Document Crunch six months ago and abandoned it. Our estimators are spending 40% of their time on contract review. Leadership keeps saying 'use AI' but nobody owns the decision. We need someone to tell us what to actually buy and in what order."
Nine tools across estimation, contract review, and submittal logging. The reason Document Crunch failed the first time, and the configuration change that would make it stick. A deployment sequence starting with the lowest-risk pilot. A budget envelope mapped to actual line items, not vendor list pricing.
Solo registered investment advisor, two assistants, building an AI-assisted client research workflow.
"I want to use AI for client research and meeting prep, but my compliance officer is nervous about anything that touches client data leaving our environment. I need to know which tools are safe, which aren't, and how to document the difference for our next SEC exam."
Eight tools, five of which run locally or in compliant cloud environments. A specific routing pattern that keeps client-identifying data out of any third-party LLM pipeline. A single-page documentation template the compliance officer can drop into the firm's policy binder. Two tools were excluded by name and the exclusion was explained.
The price is the price. There is no sliding scale, no introductory offer, no package of three. The toolkit is sold by being good and being known.
If you are a serious operator, these are the questions you are already running internally. ECCO answers them up front, in writing, before any conversation begins.
Below this number, the work is not worth doing — a tailored toolkit takes six to ten hours of curation, writing, and quality checking against ECCO's full Library and tool intelligence layer. Above this number, you start comparing it to a hands-on Operator Residency and asking why not just hire ECCO to build the stack with you. $7,500 is the seam between productized expertise and bespoke implementation. It is the price at which a serious operator says "yes, that's worth it to skip 40 hours of my own research." We charge it without flinching because the work justifies it.
The free path stays free. The Library indexes every tool we evaluate. The Scanner runs the same five-layer diagnostic the toolkit's gap map is built from. The Integrity Blueprint PDF is available for download with no payment. If the Patron Toolkit is not in your budget right now, those three artifacts are complete on their own — they were designed that way deliberately. The Toolkit is not a paywalled version of the Library. It is a different deliverable for a different need.
The Library is the inventory. The Toolkit is the judgment about that inventory applied to your specific situation. Two patrons in the same vertical with identical intakes will still receive noticeably different toolkits because their stated pain points differ. Every recommendation is paired with a reason that names something from your intake. Every cut from the long list comes with a one-line rationale. You are paying for the curation, not the catalog.
The toolkit includes a Quiet Spots section that names the limits of the recommendation in writing. If your real bottleneck is upstream of any AI tool, the document says so. If a recommendation depends on an assumption ECCO is making about your environment, the assumption is named. The 30-minute optional walkthrough call exists precisely so you can stress-test the recommendations against context that didn't fit in the intake form. The toolkit is not infallible. It is honest about where it isn't.
No money-back guarantee, because the deliverable is custom intellectual work that cannot be returned. What you get instead is structural: a fixed scope, a single hand-curated document, a written acknowledgment of limits, and an optional walkthrough. If something in the document is factually wrong, ECCO corrects it without charge. If you want a different scope of work, that is a different engagement. The integrity is in the construction, not in the refund policy.
From intake to delivery: typically seven to ten business days. ECCO does not run a queue with rolling weekly drops. Each toolkit gets focused attention from start to finish so it doesn't drift. If ECCO's calendar can't honor that timeline when your intake arrives, you'll be told before the engagement is accepted, not after.
There isn't any, and that is the point. The Patron Toolkit is a walk-away-complete deliverable. If you want hands-on implementation support, that is the Operator Residency — a separate, opt-in engagement on its own terms. The toolkit does not exist to funnel you into the Residency. Most patrons who buy the toolkit will never need anything else from ECCO. That is success, not a missed conversion.
You do. The PDF is yours. The recommendations are yours to act on, share internally, hand to your IT lead, or put in a board packet. ECCO retains the right to use anonymized patterns from the engagement to improve the Library and inform future toolkits — but no client name, no company detail, and no proprietary information ever leaves the engagement without explicit written consent.
The market is crowded with offerings that look adjacent and aren't. Stating the difference up front prevents wasted conversations later.
ECCO publishes the Library, the Scanner, and the Integrity Blueprint without payment because the doctrine spreads by being cheap, public, and copyable. None of these are inferior tiers. They are complete on their own.
Sixty seconds, five questions, no email required. The Library indexes every tool ECCO has evaluated, with pricing and industry mapping. The Blueprint is the five-layer compliance framework the Toolkit's gap map is built from. If any of these answer your question, you have what you need.
The intake takes about ten minutes. You'll be asked about your industry, your current AI stack, and your actual pain points. From there, ECCO does the curation work and ships your toolkit within seven to ten business days.
Begin Intake →